home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: deimos.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de!lindi
- From: Peter Hertel <peter.hertel@physik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
- Subject: Re: Modula-2 Compiler
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 10:23:33 +0100
- Organization: Universitaet Osnabrueck
- Message-ID: <310C9215.17E@physik.uni-osnabrueck.de>
- References: <4e0thk$2jke@news-s01.ny.us.ibm.net> <DLLyr6.1sC@cix.compulink.co.uk> <DLMtw2.41J@lut.ac.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: phe.physik.uni-osnabrueck.de
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b5 (Win95; I)
-
- I tried all of them and learned to like the Stony Brook professional
- development system. It produces the smallest and fastest code if
- properly tuned. It sticks to the rules as much as possible with DOS. N
- Now I am waiting for a 32bit version for Windows95. Will there be one?
-
- J.Last wrote:
- >
- > Here in my department (Electronic Engineering) we use the StonyBrook QuickMod
- > compiler, which is not much cop to say the least. Perhaps the StonyBrook
- > Professional is better? This compiler does come with an excellent programming
- > environment, which makes the poor quality of the compiler a shame.
-